President Trump signed America’s first landmark legislation regulating cryptocurrency into law last summer, highlighting the challenges federal lawmakers and regulatory agencies face as they try to keep up with rapidly developing emerging technologies.
Read MoreFor more than fifty years, language access has been treated as a component of national origin discrimination under federal civil rights law. Recent federal policy shifts expose the vulnerability of language access protections grounded primarily in administrative practice.
Read MoreThis article examines why banning source of income (SOI) discrimination by landlords is only half the battle in preventing housing discrimination. Stronger enforcement methods are necessary, and the law must reflect that.
Read MoreWhile we have witnessed remarkable progress in achieving compensation for student athletes, there are still questions as to the future of compensation schemes, employment status, and compensation equity.
Rhode Island’s non-competes find their power in a space between legality and leverage.
Read MoreHow the rise of anti-ESG laws, corporate disclosure rollbacks, and mounting court challenges are reshaping the future of climate reporting and corporate governance in the U.S.
Read MoreHow Barrett’s emerging judicial independence reveals both the limits of political control over the court and a shifting definition of conservatism.
From their genesis in English common law to their controversial use in the fast food industry, noncompete clauses have come to be a focal point in the debate about the interplay between business interests, employees’ rights, and economic growth. Although individual states have different regulations on noncompetes, the Federal Trade Commission recently tried and failed to instate a nationwide ban, allowing these much-disputed legal agreements to continue to play a role in American labor markets.
Read MoreIn a country that has felt the consequences of an outdated international dispute resolution system and has taken decisive actions to exit it, renewed interest from recent Ecuadorian presidents raises legal questions and concerns among the public.
The pending Supreme Court Case Chiles v. Salazar tackles the issue of conversion therapy and the states’ purview in regulating it. This piece explores the mechanics of utilizing Free Exercise as a tool to advance conservative legal change and the ramifications that it can have for civil and human rights, especially regarding marginalized communities.
Read MoreThe November 2025 SNAP benefits dispute demonstrates how a political stalemate can destabilize programs intended to operate continuously, raising fundamental questions about who bears responsibility when funding collapses.
This analysis examines crime trends through the only lens that matters: measurable outcomes. Rather than speculation or political narratives, it focuses strictly on laws, court decisions, and enforcement actions that produced verifiable effects, positive, negative, or neutral. The goal is to distinguish what changed crime in the real world from what merely changed the debate.
Read MoreMayor Adams’ City of Yes for Housing Opportunity amendment falls short of fixing New York’s housing crisis. Mayor-elect Mamdani must transform this reform into real affordability.
Read MoreA government that can’t fund itself isn’t broken overnight—it erodes through years of partisan incentives. This shutdown is just the latest evidence of a Congress that rewards confrontation over cooperation. The crisis isn’t the lapse in funding but the polarization that made it inevitable.
Read MoreExploring the intersection between soccer, migration, labor, and law in Saudi Arabia and Qatar
Read MoreAs we await decisions in the cases of Trump v. Cook and Trump v. Slaughter, let’s take a step back and examine what the Unitary Executive Theory is, where it came from, and how it is making waves in the current administration.
Read More
