Brown Undergraduate Law Review
SUBMIT FAQS
About Partnerships Disclaimers Contact Join!
Spring 2025 — Vol. 6 No.2 Fall 2024 — Vol. 6 No.1 Spring 2024 — Vol. 5 No.2 Fall 2023 — Vol. 5 No. 1 Spring 2023 — Vol. 4 No. 2 Fall 2022 — Vol. 4 No. 1 Spring 2022 — Vol. 3 No. 2 Fall 2021 — Vol. 3 No. 1 Spring 2021 — Vol. 2 No. 2 Fall 2020 — Vol. 2 No. 1 Fall 2020 — Additional Papers Spring 2020 — Vol. 1 No. 1
All Articles Student Contributions Faculty Contributions
INTERVIEWS PODCAST
2024-2025 Editorial Board Archival Mastheads
THE BULR About Partnerships Disclaimers Contact Join! LAW REVIEW Spring 2025 — Vol. 6 No.2 Fall 2024 — Vol. 6 No.1 Spring 2024 — Vol. 5 No.2 Fall 2023 — Vol. 5 No. 1 Spring 2023 — Vol. 4 No. 2 Fall 2022 — Vol. 4 No. 1 Spring 2022 — Vol. 3 No. 2 Fall 2021 — Vol. 3 No. 1 Spring 2021 — Vol. 2 No. 2 Fall 2020 — Vol. 2 No. 1 Fall 2020 — Additional Papers Spring 2020 — Vol. 1 No. 1 BLOG All Articles Student Contributions Faculty Contributions SUBMIT Media INTERVIEWS PODCAST MASTHEAD 2024-2025 Editorial Board Archival Mastheads FAQS
Brown Undergraduate Law Review
From “Horse-and-Buggy” to Wickard v. Filburn: The Roosevelt Revolt and the Supreme Court’s 1937 Reinterpretation of the Commerce Clause

Luke Angelillo ‘21 | direct link: bit.ly/angelillo-bulr

Student ContributorLuke Angelillo '21September 17, 2020Comment
Facebook0 Twitter LinkedIn0 Reddit Tumblr Pinterest0 0 Likes
Previous

Katz v. U.S.: Safeguarding Privacy Against Modern Technologies

Student ContributorJaehyun Hong '24November 8, 2020
Next

Maximizing Benefits of Using DNA Data While Protecting Us from Its Misuse

Student ContributorSuzanne Antoniou '20
September 17, 2020

Our blog is up and running! Take a look here.

bulr@brown.edu
Hours